From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11170 invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2007 22:43:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 11156 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Sep 2007 22:43:26 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:43:24 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5BD982AD; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:43:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEADF98100; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:43:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IYrDV-0007Oo-Ph; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:43:21 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:43:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: What happended to sepdebug.exp? Message-ID: <20070921224321.GB27875@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200709092149.l89Ln4pK017577@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070909215527.GA22886@caradoc.them.org> <200709092225.l89MPnxe007011@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200709092225.l89MPnxe007011@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00283.txt.bz2 On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 12:25:49AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 17:55:27 -0400 > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > > > On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 11:49:04PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > On OpenBSD I'm seeing the following testsuite regression/freakout: > > > > I noticed something similar today while testing ia64-linux. > > > > > 1. The "PASS: debuglink: XXXX" look wrong to me, do people see those > > > on other systems too? > > > > I've been meaning to fix this. > > Please do ;). Fixed as attached. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery 2007-09-21 Daniel Jacobowitz * gdb.base/sepdebug.exp (test_different_dir): Append to pf_prefix. Index: gdb.base/sepdebug.exp =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sepdebug.exp,v retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -p -r1.9 sepdebug.exp --- gdb.base/sepdebug.exp 1 Sep 2007 08:16:16 -0000 1.9 +++ gdb.base/sepdebug.exp 21 Sep 2007 22:42:15 -0000 @@ -836,7 +836,8 @@ proc test_different_dir {type test_diffe global pf_prefix global bp_location6 decimal hex - set pf_prefix "$type:" + set old_pf_prefix $pf_prefix + append pf_prefix " $type:" gdb_exit gdb_start @@ -937,7 +938,7 @@ proc test_different_dir {type test_diffe gdb_expect -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" {} } - unset pf_prefix + set pf_prefix $old_pf_prefix # proc test_different_dir }