From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4722 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2007 21:28:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 4704 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Sep 2007 21:28:28 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:28:20 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7D698152; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:28:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8117E9810B; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:28:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IXkcC-0004mj-Ud; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:28:16 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:28:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jim Blandy Cc: Emi SUZUKI , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] checking the Z-packet support on gdbserver Message-ID: <20070918212816.GA18378@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Blandy , Emi SUZUKI , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070913.210822.19763360.emi-suzuki@tjsys.co.jp> <20070914.183913.226021396.emi-suzuki@tjsys.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2 On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 02:17:11PM -0700, Jim Blandy wrote: > This looks good to me. Dan should probably approve the gdbserver > side, but that looks appropriately done to me, too. Please see my earlier response. The question is what information we should ask the remote target for, before we set a protocol in stone to ask it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery