From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13423 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2007 19:49:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 13414 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Sep 2007 19:49:41 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:49:33 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7AD9810B for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:49:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8919810A for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:49:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IXMb1-0003i3-5Y for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:49:30 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:49:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA/solib-svr4] use AT_BASE auxiliary entry to compute load base address Message-ID: <20070917194926.GA13293@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070912211805.GF10540@adacore.com> <20070916193558.GA27177@caradoc.them.org> <20070917194213.GA3882@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070917194213.GA3882@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00235.txt.bz2 On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 12:42:13PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > and did not find any loaded libraries or else did not find the > > interpreter in the list. That's strange and almost certainly > > indicates a bug that we should fix. The loader should have > > been in the list at that point. Maybe it has a different > > filename in the list than in .interp? > > Hmmm, that does ring a bell. I think we discussed another symptom > of the same problem: > > (gdb) start > Breakpoint 1 at 0x2d100: file a_test.adb, line 4. > Starting program: /[...]/a_test > warning: Temporarily disabling breakpoints for unloaded shared library "/usr/lib/ld.so.1" > > (that was on gdb@ around Mar, 11th 2007) Ah, that's why it sounded familiar. Yes, this is likely to be the same thing. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery