From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28822 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2007 13:37:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 28812 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Sep 2007 13:37:09 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:37:04 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA1C9810B; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:37:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D11F9810A; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:37:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IXGma-0003kx-P6; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:37:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:37:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Luis Machado Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] Backtrace prints wrong argument value Message-ID: <20070917133700.GA14300@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Luis Machado , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <1177527233.12599.42.camel@localhost> <20070425191304.GA1283@caradoc.them.org> <1179293640.4323.16.camel@localhost> <20070516144250.GD24682@caradoc.them.org> <1189694765.4564.5.camel@localhost> <20070916194510.GC27177@caradoc.them.org> <1190034278.4651.10.camel@localhost> <20070917131542.GA12835@caradoc.them.org> <1190035779.4651.16.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1190035779.4651.16.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00219.txt.bz2 On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:29:39AM -0300, Luis Machado wrote: > >From the mail body it's doubled, it seems, due to my mailer. Did you try > to just save the attached file? That works correct for me, and it's the > only way i can trust it will work right. > > If that doesn't work, let me know and i'll submit again in a different > way. Nope, it's still corrupted. I don't know why... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery