From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17016 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2007 22:17:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 17001 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Sep 2007 22:17:15 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 22:17:10 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8D7982A2; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 22:17:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69BA98108; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 22:17:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IWfwp-0002Rj-6a; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 18:17:07 -0400 Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 22:17:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] printf "%p" gdb internal error fix Message-ID: <20070915221707.GA9334@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070904141926.GA27477@caradoc.them.org> <20070904205307.GA17062@caradoc.them.org> <20070915135229.GA15879@caradoc.them.org> <20070915161220.GA21878@caradoc.them.org> <20070915184002.GA31306@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00200.txt.bz2 On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 12:59:43AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Yes, there's no single way that is right here. I've chosen to talk > vaguely about a "C standard" because saying something precise would be > very hard without going into a lot of detail. And I used C99 > (implicitly) as the baseline because I believe more and more C > programmers regard it as _the_ standard as time passes. Thanks, makes sense to me now. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery