From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4086 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2007 01:02:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 4070 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Sep 2007 01:02:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 01:02:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96212AAF8F for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 21:02:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id iTWX1S4jYYKS for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 21:02:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C3C2AAF7A for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 21:02:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 044DFE7B58; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 21:02:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 01:02:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA/solib-svr4] use AT_BASE auxiliary entry to compute load base address Message-ID: <20070913010208.GC3660@adacore.com> References: <20070912211805.GF10540@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070912211805.GF10540@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00168.txt.bz2 > 2007-09-12 Joel Brobecker > > * solib-svr4.c: Add include of "auxv.h". > (enable_break): Use the AT_BASE auxiliary entry if available. > * Makefile.in (solib-svr4.o): Update dependencies. > > Tested on x86-linux, no regression. Currently testing on sparc-solaris, > but it's taking a loooong time because sigstep is keeps timing out to > death. It fixes the issue above, and I'm confident the results will be OK. Just for the record: Testing just finished and confirmed no regression on sparc-solaris either. -- Joel