From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28747 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2007 19:12:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 28739 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Sep 2007 19:12:30 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:12:25 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C461C98308; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:12:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7469812E; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:12:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IUogI-0005XC-Ex; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:12:22 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:12:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch 0/1] Threaded Watchpoints Message-ID: <20070910191222.GA21230@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070910185427.GA20125@caradoc.them.org> <200709101903.l8AJ3Q7W012168@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200709101903.l8AJ3Q7W012168@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00147.txt.bz2 On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:03:26PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > The only problem with moving HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT into the > target vector might be the remote targets. Is this information > available via the remote protocol somehow? If not, I guess it has > to stay in gdbarch ... No, it is not. We could add it, but of course existing remote stubs won't tell us which it is. I guess it depends: are there any targets where it varies based on how you're connected? There's room in the world for such a thing: an x86 simulator (like, say, qemu) might offer steppable or non-steppable watchpoints instead of continuable ones. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery