From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3273 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2007 18:30:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 3260 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Sep 2007 18:30:45 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:30:40 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19059812E; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:30:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73F298310; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:30:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IUo1t-0004uA-OE; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:30:37 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:30:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Luis Machado Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch 0/1] Threaded Watchpoints Message-ID: <20070910183037.GB18690@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Luis Machado , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1187013078.4346.9.camel@localhost> <1187631217.11176.8.camel@localhost> <1187631568.11176.11.camel@localhost> <20070905020350.GA10025@caradoc.them.org> <1188995481.4879.5.camel@localhost> <20070910002103.GA25048@caradoc.them.org> <1189438454.4318.9.camel@localhost> <20070910154443.GA10167@caradoc.them.org> <1189446990.4318.21.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1189446990.4318.21.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00142.txt.bz2 On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 02:56:30PM -0300, Luis Machado wrote: > As for the testcases, since PPC only supports one hardware watchpoint > per process, we should work that test case in a different way or mark it > as unsupported for PPC and write a different test case. Oops, you're correct. This should be easy to check for in the testcase; I don't remember if we'll get an error or a software watchpoint for the second watchpoint. Actually, I think PPC will currently "succeed" and things will go wrong... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery