From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15067 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2007 19:53:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 15057 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Sep 2007 19:53:24 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 Sep 2007 19:53:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E262AA992; Sun, 9 Sep 2007 15:53:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 1g6GyDCYxVGy; Sun, 9 Sep 2007 15:53:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F322AA03C; Sun, 9 Sep 2007 15:53:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CD81FE7B58; Sun, 9 Sep 2007 15:53:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 19:53:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [7/9] simplify pending breakpoints Message-ID: <20070909195314.GA4275@adacore.com> References: <200709080150.05068.vladimir@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200709080150.05068.vladimir@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00129.txt.bz2 > This patch makes breakpoint_re_set_one handle pending > breakpoints and eliminates resolve_pending_breakpoints. > As a side effect, when a pending breakpoint is resolved, > it no longer changes number. The real purpose of this > patch is that with multiple breakpoints, breakpoint_re_set_one > gets to update the set of locations of a breakpoint, and this > will automatically handle pending breakpoints anyway. OK? I think that the fact that the breakpoint number of pending breakpoints no longer changes is a feature in itself worthy of a NEWS entry. Several people, in particular GUI developers, have been mentioning this issue. -- Joel