From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2094 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2007 03:42:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 2085 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Sep 2007 03:42:12 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 03:42:05 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927F5982AD; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 03:42:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CA59814E; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 03:42:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1ITrCr-0008Q3-9u; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 23:42:01 -0400 Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 03:42:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pedro Alves Cc: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [9/9] expand locations Message-ID: <20070908034201.GA32143@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves , Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200709080313.33625.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <46E1EAE8.7070603@portugalmail.pt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46E1EAE8.7070603@portugalmail.pt> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00103.txt.bz2 On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 01:20:56AM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > > Just one boring question from the newbie: > > Is the the below the correct thing to do put in the headers of the > new .exp files? Not just the GPL2, but also the dates, and the > credit (, and the bug mailing list)? > > I understand that the test structure was probably based on > an existing test as template. Depending how much of the test was based on another, the dates may be appropriate. The contributed-by notice is not - and the mailing list isn't either; we should really strip all the prep.ai.mit.edu references one of these days. There's more per-test boilerplate that can go too, e.g. the tracelevel stuff and clearing prms_id. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery