From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8784 invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2007 21:12:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 8775 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Aug 2007 21:12:44 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:12:38 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E3998154; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:12:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7D5980BD; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:12:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IRDn8-0006b4-IR; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:12:34 -0400 Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:12:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, roland@redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch approval?] build-id .debug files load (like .gnu_debuglink) Message-ID: <20070831211234.GA25125@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jan Kratochvil , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, roland@redhat.com References: <20070824180450.GA4216@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20070824182028.GA19512@caradoc.them.org> <20070825224914.GA11255@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20070825235805.GA11876@caradoc.them.org> <20070826094053.GA31348@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20070831205036.GA27344@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070831205036.GA27344@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00563.txt.bz2 On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 10:50:36PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:38:37 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > (assuming that the code patch is approved), > > AFAIK I did not get a final approval. > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2007-08/msg00478.html I just looked over your final patch; the code part is OK. Thanks for your patience. I didn't look too closely at the test - if it fails, we'll fix it :-) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery