From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14860 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2007 20:34:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 14825 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Aug 2007 20:34:28 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:34:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2582AAC25; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:34:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id E53WXz9LwuCW; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:34:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0532AABF8; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:34:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2A26CE7B58; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:34:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:34:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Carlos Eduardo Seo Cc: Luis Machado , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] ptype: show members of an unnamed struct inside an union Message-ID: <20070828203420.GB3795@adacore.com> References: <46C4D20E.1010703@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20070828171422.GB3874@adacore.com> <46D47155.5000403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20070828200356.GA3795@adacore.com> <46D4818C.1030001@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46D4818C.1030001@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00504.txt.bz2 > > Yes, I had to add a name to this field. Otherwise, there is no way > > to name it! > > > What about the case of an unnamed union, such as in my example? GDB > won't support displaying its members then? Does this case actually make any sense? I don't think you can access this union in your C program either, or can you? -- Joel