From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19209 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2007 17:53:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 19177 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Aug 2007 17:53:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:53:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489102AA949 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:53:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id frV5c0W4zyTC for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:53:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA902AA8C9 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:53:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6F629E7B58; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:57:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:53:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA/commit] Moving to GPLv3 ... (part 0/???) Message-ID: <20070823175713.GA7552@adacore.com> References: <20070818013915.GB24165@adacore.com> <20070821134333.GD25612@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070821134333.GD25612@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00439.txt.bz2 Thanks to Michael and Daniel for quickly review the patches. > I don't know if there are any additional files in sim which we should > be updating but I suspect there are. Anyway, this gets us 99% of the > way there. I'll double-check the sim/ subdirectory, but I think we'll be in good enough shape for the gdb-6.7 release. I still need to take care of the "info copying/warranty" patch too. > Does the documentation need an update? Not as far as I can tell. The documentation is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. -- Joel