From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32279 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2007 11:48:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 31975 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Aug 2007 11:48:55 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:48:53 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061A89810B; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:48:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF1F9810A; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:48:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IOBBD-0001NV-BD; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:48:51 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:48:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nick Roberts Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] MI and MI2 should have identical behavior on -target-download command Message-ID: <20070823114851.GA5283@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Roberts , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <46CA01BF.3000501@hq.tensilica.com> <18122.55169.70021.143467@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070821132753.GA25612@caradoc.them.org> <18123.51896.668673.942676@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070822110857.GA24767@caradoc.them.org> <18125.9502.824826.171099@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18125.9502.824826.171099@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00438.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 06:11:42PM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote: > > > Sorry, my comment was meant to be more general: What behaviour do you want > > > for miN? where N >= 3. > > > > The same as the current MI2 behavior, I think. > > But your patch only gives that behaviour for N = 3. For each version it creates a uiout with the same level. I can't exactly call mi_out_new (4) yet... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery