From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1642 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2007 11:09:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 1499 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Aug 2007 11:09:08 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:09:04 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048CD9810A; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:09:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7462298109; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:09:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1INo54-0006Vp-1N; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 07:08:58 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:09:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nick Roberts Cc: Maxim Grigoriev , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Pete MacLiesh , Marc Gauthier , Ross Morley Subject: Re: [PATCH] MI and MI2 should have identical behavior on -target-download command Message-ID: <20070822110857.GA24767@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Roberts , Maxim Grigoriev , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Pete MacLiesh , Marc Gauthier , Ross Morley References: <46CA01BF.3000501@hq.tensilica.com> <18122.55169.70021.143467@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070821132753.GA25612@caradoc.them.org> <18123.51896.668673.942676@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18123.51896.668673.942676@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00430.txt.bz2 On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 05:33:44PM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote: > Sorry, my comment was meant to be more general: What behaviour do you want for > miN? where N >= 3. The same as the current MI2 behavior, I think. There's only a difference because of an accident and because of the strange properties of how this hook is called. That's part of why it's deprecated, I guess. It gets called sometimes when the global uiout is wrong. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery