From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17568 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2007 13:44:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 17457 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Aug 2007 13:44:31 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:44:26 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FC7980C1; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:44:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25031980C0; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:44:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1INU1v-00076n-Fw; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:44:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:44:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andreas Schwab Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GPLv3: copying.awk needs to be adjusted Message-ID: <20070821134423.GE25612@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andreas Schwab , Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070818024200.GD24165@adacore.com> <20070819045854.GA4437@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00416.txt.bz2 On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 10:07:08AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > # Make copying.c from COPYING > $(srcdir)/copying.c: @MAINTAINER_MODE_TRUE@ \ > - $(srcdir)/COPYING $(srcdir)/copying.awk > + $(srcdir)/COPYING3 $(srcdir)/copying.awk > awk -f $(srcdir)/copying.awk \ > - < $(srcdir)/COPYING > $(srcdir)/copying.tmp > + < $(srcdir)/COPYING3 > $(srcdir)/copying.tmp > mv $(srcdir)/copying.tmp $(srcdir)/copying.c > > version.c: Makefile version.in Can we just use the COPYING3 at the top level? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery