From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11125 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2007 13:43:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 10829 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Aug 2007 13:43:38 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:43:36 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A18980C1 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:43:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133CC980C0 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:43:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1INU17-00076i-9J for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:43:33 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:43:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA/commit] Moving to GPLv3 ... (part 0/???) Message-ID: <20070821134333.GD25612@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070818013915.GB24165@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070818013915.GB24165@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00415.txt.bz2 On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 06:39:15PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > I'll be traveling all of next week, but I would still like to have > these checked in by then. I should be able to find some time for > the commits. > > Let me know if I missed any file! I've looked at all the patches that Michael hadn't already, somewhat briefly. They all look fine to commit as far as I'm concerned; I think you should go ahead. The diff for the .exp files was corrupted in transit but I'm sure you did it right :-) I don't know if there are any additional files in sim which we should be updating but I suspect there are. Anyway, this gets us 99% of the way there. Does the documentation need an update? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery