From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24571 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2007 15:29:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 24530 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Aug 2007 15:29:20 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:29:15 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AEA5980C0; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:29:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D21A980BF; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:29:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IN9Bo-0008TN-8t; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:29:12 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:29:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Luis Machado Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Watchpoints: support for thread parameters Message-ID: <20070820152912.GA32555@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Luis Machado , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1187298178.5853.11.camel@localhost> <1187365616.4520.14.camel@localhost> <20070817184953.GA1747@caradoc.them.org> <1187618630.4974.5.camel@localhost> <20070820142141.GA18034@caradoc.them.org> <1187623389.11176.5.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1187623389.11176.5.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00395.txt.bz2 On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:23:09PM -0300, Luis Machado wrote: > Makes sense. So instead of having GDB insert watchpoints in all the > threads, we would insert it just in the one we specified in the command. > That could make use of the changes to the watchpoint command, but then > we're discarding Jeff's patches, right? No, this still requires Jeff's patches as a starting point. I hope to respond to them today. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery