From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32714 invoked by alias); 17 Aug 2007 18:50:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 32632 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Aug 2007 18:50:03 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:49:57 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0027982A3; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:49:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C5398101; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:49:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IM6tN-0000SU-Gy; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:49:53 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:50:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Watchpoints: support for thread parameters Message-ID: <20070817184953.GA1747@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1187298178.5853.11.camel@localhost> <1187365616.4520.14.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00335.txt.bz2 On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 09:41:38PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Is this all that needs to be done to have thread-specific watchpoints? > Do they work after this patch as you want them to? In my opinion, not really. On some systems, you can tell the target layer which threads the watchpoint should be inserted for and spare yourself extra stops in "wrong" threads. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery