From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11925 invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2007 19:01:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 11831 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Aug 2007 19:01:46 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:01:40 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C123C98308; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:01:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F449812E; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:01:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1ILO7c-0008TF-KD; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:01:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:01:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Jerome Guitton , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/testsuite] backtrace in mixed language application Message-ID: <20070815190136.GA32546@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , Jerome Guitton , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20070810101003.GA33739@adacore.com> <20070815190110.GI11498@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070815190110.GI11498@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00316.txt.bz2 On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:01:10PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > That reminds me that we're trying to move to GPLv3, and your patch > actually refers to GPLv2. I think it's fine for this patch, we'll > fix it later with the rest of the files when we manage to do the > transition. But do give this a few days for people to object before > you commit. It's easy enough to fix up files afterwards. We don't need to worry about it. We do, however, need to get going. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery