From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28527 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2007 17:02:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 28431 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Aug 2007 17:02:10 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:02:06 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6408598130; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 17:02:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FBA9812F; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 17:02:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IHN0r-0000Il-Ns; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 13:02:01 -0400 Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:02:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Carlos O'Donell Cc: Randolph Chung , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] [hppa patch] Fix register definitions for hppa Message-ID: <20070804170201.GA1035@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Carlos O'Donell , Randolph Chung , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org References: <20070803170646.GB32611@tausq.org> <119aab440708031132h58d94c38l672a241301bda9ee@mail.gmail.com> <20070803201219.GC32611@tausq.org> <119aab440708040935l71bba985uf7a782252a760d3@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <119aab440708040935l71bba985uf7a782252a760d3@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00083.txt.bz2 On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 12:35:26PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > From the architecture point of view, CR26 and CR27 are only readable > > from userspace, so gdb should not enable somebody to set them from > > inside gdb. > > Would it be usefull to adjust the thread register when debugging glibc? Not especially. You can call a glibc function to do so, if you need. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery