From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [patch] Support core files with 0 < p_filesz < p_memsz (build-id)
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070801162202.GA11293@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2868 bytes --]
Hi,
there is now a pending patch for Linux kernels producing core files with the
first page of the ELF file for the build-id note identification (to find the
original versions/builds of the binaries used to produce the core file).
So far GDB handled either p_filesz == 0 or p_filesz == p_memsz. Patch handles
the case 0 < p_filesz < p_memsz (p_filesz == PAGE_SIZE for the build-id case).
`0 < p_filesz < p_memsz' meaning was so far undefined for the ET_CORE files.
(Testsuite run verified.)
The IMO more appropriate patch for BFD to flag the p_filesz..p_memsz part the
same way as the former (0==p_filesz)..(p_memsz) core part has been rejected:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-08/msg00013.html
Referencing former BFD patch (where no GDB modifications were needed):
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-07/msg00520.html
Regards,
Jan
New build-id enhanced Linux kernels produce core files:
Program Headers:
Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr FileSiz MemSiz Flg Align
NOTE 0x000660 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 0x000324 0x000000 0x0
LOAD 0x001000 0x0000000000400000 0x0000000000000000 0x001000 0x0b1000 R E 0x1000
^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^
LOAD 0x002000 0x00000000006b1000 0x0000000000000000 0x00a000 0x00a000 RW 0x1000
GDB-patched gdb `info files'
0x0000000000400000 - 0x0000000000401000 is load1a
0x00000000006b1000 - 0x00000000006bb000 is load2
0x0000000000419f00 <main+0>: push %r15
0x0000000000419f02 <main+2>: push %r14
BROKEN: original gdb `info files' (it sees the code sections zeroed)
0x0000000000400000 - 0x0000000000401000 is load1a
0x0000000000401000 - 0x00000000004b1000 is load1b
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
0x00000000006b1000 - 0x00000000006bb000 is load2
0x0000000000419f00 <main+0>: add %al,(%rax)
0x0000000000419f02 <main+2>: add %al,(%rax)
(as 0x419f00 >= 0x401000)
Legacy kernel core files:
Program Headers:
Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr FileSiz MemSiz Flg Align
NOTE 0x000660 0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000 0x000324 0x000000 0x0
LOAD 0x001000 0x0000000000400000 0x0000000000000000 0x000000 0x0b1000 R E 0x1000
^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^
LOAD 0x001000 0x00000000006b1000 0x0000000000000000 0x00a000 0x00a000 RW 0x1000
original gdb `info files'
# `load1' completely missing
0x00000000006b1000 - 0x00000000006bb000 is load2
0x0000000000419f00 <main+0>: push %r15
0x0000000000419f02 <main+2>: push %r14
[-- Attachment #2: gdb-cvs-build-id-core-load.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 784 bytes --]
2007-08-01 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* exec.c (add_to_section_table): Ignore the BFD_CORE `loadXb' segments.
--- ./gdb/exec.c 31 Jul 2007 21:49:21 -0000 1.67
+++ ./gdb/exec.c 1 Aug 2007 14:24:51 -0000
@@ -354,6 +354,13 @@ add_to_section_table (bfd *abfd, struct
if (!(aflag & SEC_ALLOC))
return;
+ /* Core files with 0 < p_filesz < p_memsz have the p_filesz..p_memsz section
+ without these flags. It would be considered as .bss otherwise. It would
+ mask out the real EXEC_BFD loaded code by its zeroes. */
+ if (bfd_get_format (abfd) == bfd_core
+ && !(aflag & (SEC_LOAD | SEC_HAS_CONTENTS)))
+ return;
+
(*table_pp)->bfd = abfd;
(*table_pp)->the_bfd_section = asect;
(*table_pp)->addr = bfd_section_vma (abfd, asect);
next reply other threads:[~2007-08-01 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-01 16:22 Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2007-08-02 20:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070801162202.GA11293@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox