From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7760 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2007 00:34:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 7751 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jul 2007 00:34:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:34:55 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l6J0Yrpq013642 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:34:53 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l6J0YrOH032260 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:34:53 -0400 Received: from ironwood.lan (vpn-15-13.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.15.13]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l6J0Yqcr004393 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:34:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:45:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Add another "Are you sure..." case to gdb_unload in lib/gdb.exp Message-ID: <20070718173451.544c46da@ironwood.lan> In-Reply-To: <20070714014123.GA23933@caradoc.them.org> References: <20070713182535.3af63443@ironwood.lan> <20070714014123.GA23933@caradoc.them.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.4; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg00226.txt.bz2 On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:41:23 -0400 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > However, for the testsuite's purpose you can go even further. I don't > think you need gdb_unload at all, and sid is the only remaining caller > of it. It's followed by a new gdb_file_cmd, which should suffice. You're right. This patch is withdrawn. Kevin