From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22126 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2007 11:32:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 22117 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jul 2007 11:32:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:32:32 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974A9982C6; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:32:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA91982C4; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:32:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1I8aQn-00018x-ER; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:32:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:32:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nick Roberts Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: $_ and info breakpoint [PATCH] Message-ID: <20070711113229.GA4106@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Roberts , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <18064.7905.924535.720690@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070709115647.GC3095@caradoc.them.org> <18066.53564.134378.88590@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070710014312.GA9261@caradoc.them.org> <20070710112050.GA2306@caradoc.them.org> <18068.4625.106068.817357@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070710235142.GA6510@caradoc.them.org> <18068.9698.320580.484432@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18068.9698.320580.484432@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg00171.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 12:35:46PM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote: > OK, I've found it now - there's no (gdb) prompt. I thought perhaps there > would be the same problem with $_, but that doeasn't appear to be the case. Interesting, I wonder why not. It does happen when I use -break-info manually. > I don't really understand how they control the separate terminal for program > I/O as the program is a child of GDB, and not Eclipse, so presumably Eclipse > can't create a terminal for it. In my migratory mode I use sleep to create a > terminal and send program I/O to that, but this seems a bit of a hack. I don't know if they create the pty manually and then pass its filename to GDB using -inferior-tty-set (which should work) or if they fake it some other way. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery