Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Building solib-target.c when CORE_ADDR != ULONGEST.
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 17:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070708172134.GA21380@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4690F562.9060009@portugalmail.pt>

On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 03:32:02PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> About the VEC in question.  I noticed that the xml parsing
> xmalloc's the memory for the ULONGEST, but it is safe to
> pass a pointer in a local var, right?

Yes, that's right.  The patch is OK.

> I got confused because in vec.h:
> 
>      "Because of the different behavior of structure objects, scalar
>       objects and of pointers, there are three flavors, one for each of
>       these variants.  Both the structure object and pointer variants
>       pass pointers to objects around -- in the former case the pointers
>       are stored into the vector and in the latter case the pointers are
>       dereferenced and the objects copied into the vector.  The scalar
>       object variant is suitable for int-like objects, and the vector
>       elements are returned by value.  "
> 
> Something in there confuses me.  The former/latter type of
> descriptions adds an indirection that I always find
> distracting.

Far as I can tell, Nathan got his formers and his latters crossed, and
that's why it doesn't make sense.

It would have made more sense for me to use DEF_VEC_I for these than
the DEF_VEC_O I actually used, but to be honest I didn't realize it
was there.  The use of DEF_VEC_O makes this rather more confusing
than necessary.

> The 'by value' statement isn't clear to me either:
> "object variant is suitable for int-like objects, and the vector
>       elements are returned by value.  "
> 
> T *VEC_T_index(VEC(T) *v, unsigned ix); // Object
> 
> ?  What does 'by value' mean then?

The previous word is "scalar".  Scalar object -> integer, not
structure object.  So the last bit of your correction is wrong.


> 2007-07-08  Pedro Alves  <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
> 
> 	* solib-target.c (library_list_start_segment): Cast address to CORE_ADDR.

OK.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


      reply	other threads:[~2007-07-08 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-08  1:22 Pedro Alves
2007-07-08  1:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-07-08 14:46   ` Pedro Alves
2007-07-08 17:21     ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070708172134.GA21380@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox