From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10671 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2007 20:55:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 10640 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jul 2007 20:55:24 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:55:18 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F1F982CF; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 20:55:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7833B982A5; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 20:55:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1I6upe-000124-MX; Fri, 06 Jul 2007 16:55:14 -0400 Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:55:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Mark Kettenis , nickc@redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Changing top level files and include/ files over to GPLv3 Message-ID: <20070706205514.GA3923@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , Mark Kettenis , nickc@redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org References: <200707061825.l66IPDiI029226@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070706183355.GA29794@caradoc.them.org> <20070706193817.GA2364@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070706193817.GA2364@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg00118.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:38:17PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > > Joel, are you planning to convert to GPLv3 before cutting the 6.7 > > > branch? > > > > I would suggest before. I believe all GNU projects are supposed to do > > it by the end of the month, and the release branch would definitely > > have to change. > > Sounds good to me. I was getting ready to cut the branch this coming > sunday. This is going to be a massive change; will we be able to make > that conversion in time, or should I start thinking about branching > later? Might want to ask Nick how he did it. I'm not sure if there's any way better than by hand. But it shouldn't be too hard, just large... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery