From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29311 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2007 18:34:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 29294 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jul 2007 18:34:04 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jul 2007 18:33:59 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B379982CE; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:33:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE88982A5; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:33:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1I6sct-0007ku-Qo; Fri, 06 Jul 2007 14:33:55 -0400 Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 18:34:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: nickc@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Changing top level files and include/ files over to GPLv3 Message-ID: <20070706183355.GA29794@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , nickc@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org References: <200707061825.l66IPDiI029226@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200707061825.l66IPDiI029226@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 08:25:13PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > GDB hasn't switched yet, but we have our own COPYING file in gdb/, so > I suppose there's no real problem with this. > > Joel, are you planning to convert to GPLv3 before cutting the 6.7 > branch? I would suggest before. I believe all GNU projects are supposed to do it by the end of the month, and the release branch would definitely have to change. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery