From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10218 invoked by alias); 3 Jul 2007 03:03:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 10208 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jul 2007 03:03:47 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 03:03:46 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24379829C; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 03:03:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609A49817B; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 03:03:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1I5Yfa-0008Qh-6J; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 23:03:14 -0400 Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 03:03:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nick Roberts Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: PATCH: PR tui/2173: Arrow keys no longer works in breakpoint command list Message-ID: <20070703030314.GB31907@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Roberts , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <18019.18081.448928.93993@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070604010633.GA927@caradoc.them.org> <18021.23899.394336.980207@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070605132700.GA10720@caradoc.them.org> <20070624154700.GA14862@caradoc.them.org> <18046.58688.102303.116053@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070701223745.GD337@caradoc.them.org> <18057.42533.204654.508556@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18057.42533.204654.508556@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg00058.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 01:28:05PM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote: > > > > Nick, does this work for emacs? It fixes the testcase (which I > > > > updated to fail and not time out for broken GDBs). > > > > > > Yes, this looks good to me. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Thank you for your patience. I've checked it in; GDB 6.7 will not > > have the bug. > > Thanks. Are you going to update the Wiki? More generally, is the Wiki page > for the GDB 6.7 release otherwise up-to-date? It's a little stale; I'm planning to update it in the morning, after I finish going through the patches I'd flagged. I'd do it now but I don't have my password on this computer. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery