From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8192 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2007 16:39:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 8183 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2007 16:39:36 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 16:39:34 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A8A982A5; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 16:39:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983F9982A3; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 16:39:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1I4fyP-0002JW-V2; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 12:39:02 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 16:40:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Snyder Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Michael.Snyder@access-company.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [OB] Add cleanup, source.c Message-ID: <20070630163901.GA8579@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , Eli Zaretskii , Michael.Snyder@access-company.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <9270.12.7.175.2.1183069663.squirrel@webmail.sonic.net> <20070628224815.GC12578@caradoc.them.org> <655C3D4066B7954481633935A40BB36F041427@ussunex02.svl.access-company.com> <20070628231153.GA14231@caradoc.them.org> <11470.12.7.175.2.1183080998.squirrel@webmail.sonic.net> <20070629113407.GA13561@caradoc.them.org> <003201c7ba8c$d6e0e840$677ba8c0@sonic.net> <000b01c7bb2f$d88684e0$677ba8c0@sonic.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000b01c7bb2f$d88684e0$677ba8c0@sonic.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00542.txt.bz2 On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 09:00:56AM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote: > Depends on what the "cleanups" are, I suppose. Those I'm familiar > with are mostly xfrees, fcloses, etc. Doesn't really matter what > order they are performed in, so long as they get done before the > next command loop cycle. > > Can you give me an example of such non-deterministic behavior? If you're called from any function that discards cleanups, your cleanups will be lost. There's about 50... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery