From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15285 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2007 18:30:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 15270 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jun 2007 18:30:04 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:30:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E271D2A9C26; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:29:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id GHq9G0lxAX-K; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:29:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB302A9C07; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:29:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 98CFBE7B54; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:31:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:31:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Markus Deuling Cc: GDB Patches , Ulrich Weigand , Daniel Jacobowitz , Kevin Buettner Subject: Re: [PING 2] [rfc]: Framework for looking up multiply defined global symbols in shared libraries Message-ID: <20070626183157.GC3700@adacore.com> References: <200705312124.l4VLO1qU019395@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <4664DC23.70903@de.ibm.com> <4678CFAD.2030509@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4678CFAD.2030509@de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00467.txt.bz2 Marcus, > it would be great to have that one in for 6.7 :-) Is this ok ? If your changes make it before the branch cutoff point, then they will be part of GDB 6.7. Otherwise, I am not comfortable having this ported to the branch. I still haven't completely finished reviewing the release-critical items for 6.7, so the cutoff point is still undecided, but I think it will be very soon. -- Joel