From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16545 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2007 00:59:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 16527 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jun 2007 00:59:07 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:59:04 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A7D98306; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:59:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55547982FD; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:59:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1I2zO3-0005eZ-DW; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:58:31 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:37:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: Pedro Alves , insight@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch ping^2] suppress annoying warnings about cygwin1.dbg Message-ID: <20070626005831.GA21716@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves , insight@sourceware.org References: <46262D3A.8B1A0D15@dessent.net> <20070418150137.GA7338@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <46263710.D9755DAD@dessent.net> <462639F3.FBCF4675@dessent.net> <46264A56.BA86EED7@dessent.net> <4638AB6B.5AA94B26@dessent.net> <46803846.F99470AE@dessent.net> <46804DAD.4020309@portugalmail.pt> <20070625234015.GA17640@caradoc.them.org> <4680637F.A8C3E408@dessent.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4680637F.A8C3E408@dessent.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00455.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 05:53:19PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: > Ah, wish I'd known that at the time: > Sorry, I don't read the Insight list. > So, the proper way then would be to set some flag if we're reading a > .gnu-debuglink file and not generate the warnings in the first place? I > can try to come up with something along those lines then. Either that, or just eliminate the warnings entirely. Are they ever really useful? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery