From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10338 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2007 19:13:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 10323 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jun 2007 19:13:44 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:13:42 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A353A98304; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:13:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6441C982DC; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:13:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1I2XWH-0003N4-MT; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 15:13:09 -0400 Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:13:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH: doco] gdbint.texinfo Message-ID: <20070624191309.GA12571@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <18046.4095.409804.261082@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18046.4095.409804.261082@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00439.txt.bz2 On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 06:32:31PM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote: > Also > > `gdb/ARCH-tdep.c' > `gdb/ARCH-tdep.h' > This often exists to describe the basic layout of the target > machine's processor chip (registers, stack, etc.). If used, it is > included by `TTT-tdep.h'. It can be shared among many targets > that use the same processor. > > `gdb/config/ARCH/tm-ARCH.h' > This often exists to describe the basic layout of the target > machine's processor chip (registers, stack, etc.). If used, it is > included by `tm-TTT.h'. It can be shared among many targets that > use the same processor. > > have the same description. I presume the first is wrong. Yes, the description for the first is somewhat wrong. The description for the second is a bit stale - nowadays it exists for local hacks, and we're phasing it out pretty fast. After Ulrich finished his cleanups, there are only nine left! -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10339 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2007 19:13:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 10322 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jun 2007 19:13:43 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:13:42 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A353A98304; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:13:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6441C982DC; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:13:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1I2XWH-0003N4-MT; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 15:13:09 -0400 Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:42:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH: doco] gdbint.texinfo Message-ID: <20070624191309.GA12571@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <18046.4095.409804.261082@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18046.4095.409804.261082@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00440.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20070624214200.414I8o9HLY08DxRngmtyHp0Yylrpw5p3ECM22n544RE@z> On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 06:32:31PM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote: > Also > > `gdb/ARCH-tdep.c' > `gdb/ARCH-tdep.h' > This often exists to describe the basic layout of the target > machine's processor chip (registers, stack, etc.). If used, it is > included by `TTT-tdep.h'. It can be shared among many targets > that use the same processor. > > `gdb/config/ARCH/tm-ARCH.h' > This often exists to describe the basic layout of the target > machine's processor chip (registers, stack, etc.). If used, it is > included by `tm-TTT.h'. It can be shared among many targets that > use the same processor. > > have the same description. I presume the first is wrong. Yes, the description for the first is somewhat wrong. The description for the second is a bit stale - nowadays it exists for local hacks, and we're phasing it out pretty fast. After Ulrich finished his cleanups, there are only nine left! -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery