From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6770 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2007 17:10:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 6761 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jun 2007 17:10:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:10:18 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0FDE982F9; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:10:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2C0982E4; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:10:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1I0hDq-0005GY-76; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:10:30 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:10:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Vladimir Prus , schwab@suse.de, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: ColdFire/fido support Message-ID: <20070619171030.GA20038@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Vladimir Prus , schwab@suse.de, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200705051337.02114.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200706152305.25699.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200706192039.36897.vladimir@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00371.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 12:53:40PM -0400, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Vladimir Prus > > Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:39:35 +0400 > > Cc: drow@false.org, > > schwab@suse.de, > > gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > > > @itemx not meaningful inside `itemize' block. > > Yes, I should have used @table. Sorry. > > > It also seems that the general structure says that both .*core* and coldfire.fp are optional, > > while I meant to say that one of .*core.* is required, while coldfire.fp is optional. > > But that's what the text says (I simply copied it from what you > wrote): one of the first 3, and only one, must be present, while the > last one is optional. You put "An M68K target can have either one of the following features:" before the top of the table, and the table had two rows - one for all the core features, one for the FP feature. I read that the same way Vladimir did. Maybe that sentence should be inside the description of the three @item / @itemx / @itemx core features? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery