From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-49471-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 16727 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2007 19:38:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 16718 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jun 2007 19:38:44 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:38:42 +0000
Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD4E982E4; 	Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:38:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) 	by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856DD982E3; 	Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:38:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) 	(envelope-from <drow@caradoc.them.org>) 	id 1I0N3u-0007eI-Qo; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:38:54 -0400
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:38:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>, 	Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
Subject: Re: [rfc] Shared libraries over the remote protocol, take two
Message-ID: <20070618193854.GA29250@caradoc.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>, 	gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>, 	Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
References: <20070618150211.GA23415@caradoc.them.org> <m3lkehqcsx.fsf@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m3lkehqcsx.fsf@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00344.txt.bz2

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 12:31:58PM -0700, Jim Blandy wrote:
> With the following DTD:
> 
>     <!-- library-list: Root element with versioning -->
>     <!ELEMENT library-list  (library)*>
>     <!ATTLIST library-list  version CDATA   #FIXED  "1.0">
>     <!ELEMENT library       (segment)*>
>     <!ATTLIST library       name    CDATA   #REQUIRED>
>     <!ELEMENT segment       EMPTY>
>     <!ATTLIST segment       address CDATA   #REQUIRED>
> 
> there's no way to have several segments at different offsets, because
> segments aren't allowed to have names.  Shouldn't segments have a name
> attribute?

I don't think we need to name them to do that.  If we did, we'd have
to define meanings for the names, and so forth...

<library-list>
  <library name="libc.so.1">
    <segment address="0x4000"/>
    <segment address="0x10000"/>
  </library>
</library-list>

The first one will be the first PT_LOAD from the ELF file, et cetera.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery