On Friday 15 June 2007 18:47, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 02:17:24PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > On Tuesday 12 June 2007 17:38, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > 
> > > > I suppose I can add file-based detection for fido, just like it's done for coldfire,
> > > > but I don't think removing XML-based detection is right. What do you think?
> > > 
> > > Right, sorry - I know what I meant to say, but I didn't say it.
> > > 
> > > Float return behavior is not a property of the target at all; it's a
> > > property of the compiler options used.  decr_pc_after_break is a
> > > target property, though, so we should trust the target.  This isn't
> > > important, though, so feel free to commit without changing this.  If
> > > it causes any problems we can clean it up later.
> > 
> > Ok, excellent.
> > 
> > I attach a patch that differs only by non-taking of address of builtin_types. OK?
> 
> I also wrote:
> 
> > This is mostly OK.  Please add a Makefile.in update for the new
> > #include.  Also, we've added XML support for another target.  So it
> > needs a new section in the manual describing which targets support
> > XML registers, and which registers are required.
> 
> It does still need those.  Other than that it's OK.

Does this doco patch look good?

- Volodya