Re: ColdFire/fido support

Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-06-19T17:10:22Z

On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 12:53:40PM -0400, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> > Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:39:35 +0400
> > Cc: drow@false.org,
> > schwab@suse.de,
> > gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> >
> > @itemx not meaningful inside `itemize' block.
>
> Yes, I should have used @table. Sorry.
>
> > It also seems that the general structure says that both .*core* and coldfire.fp are optional,
> > while I meant to say that one of .*core.* is required, while coldfire.fp is optional.
>
> But that's what the text says (I simply copied it from what you
> wrote): one of the first 3, and only one, must be present, while the
> last one is optional.

You put "An M68K target can have either one of the following
features:" before the top of the table, and the table had two rows -
one for all the core features, one for the FP feature. I read that
the same way Vladimir did. Maybe that sentence should be inside the
description of the three @item / @itemx / @itemx core features?

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery