From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5964 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2007 14:25:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 5936 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jun 2007 14:25:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:25:21 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE246982DE; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:25:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C28C98212; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:25:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1HyTmm-0006wK-5b; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:25:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:25:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: qXfer:spu:read Message-ID: <20070613142524.GA26662@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070612200257.GA12884@caradoc.them.org> <200706131417.l5DEHuh6029308@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200706131417.l5DEHuh6029308@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00232.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 04:17:56PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > But there's no qSupported support for these packets - you probably > > need to update remote_protocol_features also. > > Right - that part appears to have gotten lost. Note that the > corresponding qSupported support in gdbserver is already there ... > > Here's the missing part. Tested on spu-elf against gdbserver. > OK for mainline? Yes, thanks for fixing it! -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery