From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-49335-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 30476 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2007 20:02:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 30467 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jun 2007 20:02:51 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:02:49 +0000
Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B695982DE; 	Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:02:46 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) 	by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA59982DC; 	Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:02:43 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) 	(envelope-from <drow@caradoc.them.org>) 	id 1HyCZt-0002p9-Ed; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:02:57 -0400
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:02:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: qXfer:spu:read
Message-ID: <20070612200257.GA12884@caradoc.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>, 	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00208.txt.bz2

You added these to the manual:

@item @samp{qXfer:spu:read}
@tab No
@tab @samp{-}
@tab Yes

@item @samp{qXfer:spu:write}
@tab No
@tab @samp{-}
@tab Yes

But there's no qSupported support for these packets - you probably
need to update remote_protocol_features also.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery