From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1316 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2007 16:14:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 1307 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jun 2007 16:14:56 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate1.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate1.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.150) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:14:54 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate1.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5CGEqoG171220 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:14:52 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l5CGEpfJ3985442 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:14:51 +0200 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l5CGEpoH009626 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:14:51 +0200 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id l5CGEp6g009623; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:14:51 +0200 Message-Id: <200706121614.l5CGEp6g009623@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:14:51 +0200 Subject: Re: [1/3] Remove gdbarch-swapping of remote_address_masked To: jimb@codesourcery.com (Jim Blandy) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:14:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: from "Jim Blandy" at Jun 11, 2007 11:03:02 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00195.txt.bz2 Jim Blandy wrote: > It seems to me that this makes the remoteaddresssize setting behave > much like language settings: there's 'auto (currently blargh)' and > 'blargh'. Yes, that was the intent. > To be honest, I don't think it's worthwhile making this > variable actually behave that way. Well, we have to change *something* so we can remove the gdbarch_swap call. This change seemed the most straight- forward to me ... How would you suggest the variable should behave? > I don't even want to know what it was added for. Well, me neither ;-) Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com