Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [rfc] Eliminate current_regcache global variable
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:10:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070612141035.GF7815@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706072119.l57LJJ3j030038@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>

On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:19:19PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> as a follow-on to the patch set eliminating read_register, this patch
> gets rid of the global current_regcache variable, and makes a first step
> into the direction of real per-thread register caches.

The idea sounds fine.  I just looked at the Linux bits.
> diff -urNp gdb-orig/gdb/linux-nat.c gdb-head/gdb/linux-nat.c
> --- gdb-orig/gdb/linux-nat.c	2007-06-01 18:51:01.000000000 +0200
> +++ gdb-head/gdb/linux-nat.c	2007-06-06 19:49:08.553079253 +0200
> @@ -2580,19 +2580,26 @@ linux_nat_do_thread_registers (bfd *obfd
>    gdb_fpxregset_t fpxregs;
>  #endif
>    unsigned long lwp = ptid_get_lwp (ptid);
> -  struct gdbarch *gdbarch = current_gdbarch;
> +  struct regcache *regcache = get_thread_regcache (ptid);
> +  struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_regcache_arch (regcache);
>    const struct regset *regset;
>    int core_regset_p;
> +  ptid_t saved_ptid;
> +
> +  saved_ptid = inferior_ptid;
> +  inferior_ptid = ptid;
> +  target_fetch_registers (regcache, -1);
> +  inferior_ptid = saved_ptid;

Shouldn't we use a cleanup for this?

> @@ -2672,15 +2670,11 @@ static char *
>  linux_nat_do_registers (bfd *obfd, ptid_t ptid,
>  			char *note_data, int *note_size)
>  {
> -  registers_changed ();
> -  /* FIXME should not be necessary; fill_gregset should do it automatically. */
> -  target_fetch_registers (current_regcache, -1);
>    return linux_nat_do_thread_registers (obfd,
>  					ptid_build (ptid_get_pid (inferior_ptid),
>  						    ptid_get_pid (inferior_ptid),
>  						    0),
>  					note_data, note_size);
> -  return note_data;
>  }

Why'd the return value go?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-12 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-07 21:19 Ulrich Weigand
2007-06-12 14:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2007-06-12 14:20   ` Ulrich Weigand
2007-06-12 14:27     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-06-16 17:19 ` Ulrich Weigand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070612141035.GF7815@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox