From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14491 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2007 13:58:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 14416 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jun 2007 13:58:12 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:58:09 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B17E982F1; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:58:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A273982DC; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:58:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Hy6t4-0003qj-NP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:58:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:58:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, eliz@gnu.org Subject: Re: [rfc/rfa] [3/4] SPU enhancements: gdbserver support Message-ID: <20070612135822.GE7815@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, eliz@gnu.org References: <20070605183409.GA4395@caradoc.them.org> <200706052302.l55N2VFt030803@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200706052302.l55N2VFt030803@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00159.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 01:02:31AM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 04:09:56PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:05:01PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > > > > Fine with me. I'd appreciate if you could post that code ... > > > > > > I'll try to do this tomorrow morning. > > > > There's not as much code for it as I remembered. > > Thanks. It looks like the require_data routine you posted is nearly > identical to the already existing remote_unescape_input routine, so > I just used that one. > > The patch below should address both issues you raised. OK? Yes, this version is fine with me. Thanks. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery