From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30995 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2007 13:44:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 30986 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jun 2007 13:44:58 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate2.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate2.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.151) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Jun 2007 13:44:56 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate2.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l59DiseF113134 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 13:44:54 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l59DirMS4042898 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 15:44:53 +0200 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l59DirVw028531 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 15:44:53 +0200 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id l59DirGd028527; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 15:44:53 +0200 Message-Id: <200706091344.l59DirGd028527@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 9 Jun 2007 15:44:53 +0200 Subject: Re: [rfc] [1/9] Remove macro REGISTER_NAME To: deuling@de.ibm.com (Markus Deuling) Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 13:44:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org (GDB Patches) In-Reply-To: <4668F6C2.7030507@de.ibm.com> from "Markus Deuling" at Jun 08, 2007 08:27:14 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00132.txt.bz2 Markus Deuling wrote: > thank you very much for your review. I attached a patch that addresses those points. > > Ok to commit? Thanks for fixing those issues, the patch looks good to me now. It looks like the patch was missing the re-generated gdbarch.c diff. I've re-generated the file, and committed the patch together with it. Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com