From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23554 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2007 19:10:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 23546 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jun 2007 19:10:45 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:10:44 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40952982E4; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 19:10:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47A8982CF; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 19:10:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Hw0tz-0006P1-VM; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:10:39 -0400 Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:10:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Luis Machado Cc: gdb-patches , Thiago Jung Bauermann Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] [RFC] decimal floating point support Message-ID: <20070606191039.GA24587@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Luis Machado , gdb-patches , Thiago Jung Bauermann References: <1175012961.21904.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1176495589.13824.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070424214013.GA5173@caradoc.them.org> <1180010972.8620.4.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1180010972.8620.4.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00074.txt.bz2 On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:49:32AM -0300, Luis Machado wrote: > Hi folks, > > Do we have any news on the reviewing process of this DFP patch? I was > thinking of refreshing for latest HEAD and re-submitting, and if anyone > has suggestions on it i'd like to include on the newer version. I had not gotten around to looking at it. If you want to resubmit, I'll try to be prompter. Are there bits to make GDB depend on libdecnumber at build time already, or should I take care of that when we merge libdecnumber to src? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery