From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27347 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2007 20:10:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 27339 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Jun 2007 20:10:26 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:10:24 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA287982E4; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:10:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A25982E2; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:10:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1HvIsG-0006lC-6r; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:09:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:10:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, eliz@gnu.org Subject: Re: [rfc/rfa] [3/4] SPU enhancements: gdbserver support Message-ID: <20070604200956.GA25808@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, eliz@gnu.org References: <20070604195349.GC23516@caradoc.them.org> <200706042005.l54K51nH029199@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200706042005.l54K51nH029199@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00043.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:05:01PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Fine with me. I'd appreciate if you could post that code ... I'll try to do this tomorrow morning. > That should fix our problem as well. I just wasn't sure if the > existing behaviour was deliberate for the other packet types ... Nope - purely accidental. I also tried pushing the flag into an argument to to_xfer_partial, but it was too messy. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery