From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17983 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2007 13:58:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 17974 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Jun 2007 13:58:16 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate3.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate3.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.152) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:58:10 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate3.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l54Dw8ag189124 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:58:08 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l54Dw7PZ3301512 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:58:07 +0200 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l54Dw7pW029538 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:58:07 +0200 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id l54Dw7sd029535; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:58:07 +0200 Message-Id: <200706041358.l54Dw7sd029535@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:58:07 +0200 Subject: Re: [rfc/rfa] [3/4] SPU enhancements: gdbserver support To: eliz@gnu.org Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:58:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, drow@false.org In-Reply-To: from "Eli Zaretskii" at Jun 03, 2007 12:43:56 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > What do you mean by ``keyword''? Isn't @var{object} a _name_ of an > > > object or its symbol? > > > > This is just copied from the pre-existing text (also present in the > > qXfer::read section). In any case, I think "keyword" is right here, > > as you can only use one of the defined strings ("auxv", "memory-map", > > "spu", ...) as "object". > > Then please say something like this: > > (@var{object} can be @samp{auxv}, @samp{memory-map}, @samp{spu}...) I guess I may be misunderstanding something, but already today the paragraph immediately following the quoted sentence says: "Here are the specific requests of this form defined so far." and then goes on to describe in detail the auxv, memory-map, etc. variants. What would be the benefit of repeating that list once again? Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com