From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4084 invoked by alias); 22 May 2007 23:19:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 4071 invoked by uid 22791); 22 May 2007 23:19:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 May 2007 23:19:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F2B48CC2C; Tue, 22 May 2007 19:19:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18076-01-8; Tue, 22 May 2007 19:19:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (S0106000f3d96cb6d.vc.shawcable.net [24.85.42.33]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4FC48CBFB; Tue, 22 May 2007 19:19:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5A527E7B4F; Tue, 22 May 2007 16:19:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 23:19:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [commit/AIX] Fix error when loading core file Message-ID: <20070522231959.GA4860@adacore.com> References: <20070520000154.GW3565@adacore.com> <200705201511.l4KFBlYB015777@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <20070522181435.GB5285@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070522181435.GB5285@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00357.txt.bz2 > > I'll try to get back to doing this, but it'll be some time. If > > you want to work at it earlier, that would certainly be welcome. > > If you don't mind looking at this, then this is great. I just noticed > some issues with thread switching that I can have a look at - I'm much > more familiar with this part of the code than with LDINFO structures... Actually, I just found that this was an issue with our ada-tasks module. AdaCore's debugger has an ada-tasks module that provides support for the "task" concept that we have in Ada. We haven't contributed this code yet because it is desperately in need of a rewrite. It is serving very well, but the coding is not up to the GDB standards :-(. Anyway, I am kept busy with stuff out of work (tennis officiating) so I won't probably have a chance to have a look at this soon. However, I will remember to send a note if I do have a chance to work on this before you do. -- Joel