Re: ser-unix.c: Add hardware flow control support

Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-05-02T14:11:10Z

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> I noticed while looking for the right place to put the option that we
> have an empty "set serial". Perhaps it should go under that instead.
> No strong preference.

Well, we have "set remotebaud", which is at the top-level as well. And
which actually raises a question as to whether "set remoteflow" should not
be handled through "struct serial_ops" too? This way other serial
interfaces would have a chance to handle the option as well if somebody
cared.

Any opinions?

Maciej