Re: ser-unix.c: Add hardware flow control support

Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-05-21T12:50:34Z

On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 01:21:51PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2007, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>
> > > I noticed while looking for the right place to put the option that we
> > > have an empty "set serial". Perhaps it should go under that instead.
> > > No strong preference.
> >
> > Well, we have "set remotebaud", which is at the top-level as well. And
> > which actually raises a question as to whether "set remoteflow" should not
> > be handled through "struct serial_ops" too? This way other serial
> > interfaces would have a chance to handle the option as well if somebody
> > cared.
> >
> > Any opinions?
>
> OK, I gather there is no potential interest in platform-independent
> approach at the moment, so I guess it may be implemented based on
> ser-unix.c if a need arises. Here is my current version of the patch.

This is fine with me; Eli, are the documentation changes OK?

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery