From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4691 invoked by alias); 14 May 2007 17:22:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 4683 invoked by uid 22791); 14 May 2007 17:22:04 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 May 2007 17:22:02 +0000 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89EF4B267 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 12:22:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A124B262 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 12:22:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1HneFE-0001WM-Bg for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 14 May 2007 13:22:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 17:22:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] dwarf2 unwinder and MIPS n32 Message-ID: <20070514172200.GC4818@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070430132613.GD25539@caradoc.them.org> <200704301843.l3UIhqrP002111@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200704301843.l3UIhqrP002111@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2 On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 08:43:52PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > Well then, how about we add one? Your mention of symmetry is I think > > very important; we have a lot of different ways to manipulate longs / > > addresses, and I'd rather reduce than increase the number, but the > > first step is to make the interfaces we have consistent. > > > > Tested on mips64-linux N32, where it still fixes the problem; unlike > > the previous patch, this one should not break segmented architectures > > that need to adjust pointers and addresses. > > Looks good to me ... Thanks! I checked it in. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery