From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2630 invoked by alias); 14 May 2007 17:15:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 2620 invoked by uid 22791); 14 May 2007 17:15:25 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 May 2007 17:15:23 +0000 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3204B267; Mon, 14 May 2007 12:15:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A564F4B262; Mon, 14 May 2007 12:15:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Hne8n-0001QP-1w; Mon, 14 May 2007 13:15:21 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 17:15:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jerome Guitton Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] dwarf2read - empty file name table Message-ID: <20070514171520.GA4818@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jerome Guitton , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20070419141647.GA53265@adacore.com> <20070419142312.GA32273@caradoc.them.org> <20070419150614.GG70722@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070419150614.GG70722@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00242.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:06:14PM +0200, Jerome Guitton wrote: > > > I've seen ARM's compiler produce this construct. In fact, I had a > > patch sitting in my behind schedule backlog for this very issue... > > > > Could you see if this works for you? There's a number of other places > > with the same problem. > > I confirm that it works for me, thanks! Do you plan to check it in? I have now, after a smoke test on x86_64-linux with gcc. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery