From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5269 invoked by alias); 14 May 2007 15:21:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 5256 invoked by uid 22791); 14 May 2007 15:21:54 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 May 2007 15:21:52 +0000 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886664B267; Mon, 14 May 2007 10:21:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601504B262; Mon, 14 May 2007 10:21:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1HncMv-00045l-EA; Mon, 14 May 2007 11:21:49 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 15:21:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] Eliminate write_register from solib-sunos.c Message-ID: <20070514152149.GA15148@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070513235530.GA18059@caradoc.them.org> <200705141500.l4EF0CH3027553@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200705141500.l4EF0CH3027553@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00237.txt.bz2 On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 05:00:12PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Interestingly enough, it would appear that none of the Solaris targets > are actually using solib-sunos.o. The only references I can find are > in various bsd *native* target's .mh files. > > In fact, this is very weird as those same bsd targets have solib-svr4.o > in their .mt files. Which one is getting used in that case? I'll try > to find out what's going on here ... Don't confuse SunOS and Solaris :-) I believe that solib-sunos.c is for a.out shared libraries. However I don't know which one ends up used... maybe they're getting lucky with link order? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery